They're not drones

Mike Pierson said:
I can’t find images of the sky plates, gotta link?
Click to expand...
Her findings are under peer review - not sure that the actual images were ever posted yet. She was on a podcast I listened to and the implications are pretty profound. Basically she scanned in thousands of old photographic plates taken by telescopes during the 50's and when she started overlapping them, thousands, if not tens of thousands, of 'stars' were appearing and disappearing. Some were transiting the plates too.

We didn't have anything in space until 1957

Here's results from an X search of her name. This really is remarkable.



https://twitter.com/x/status/1949911536887013563
 
Ddays said:
Her findings are under peer review - not sure that the actual images were ever posted yet. She was on a podcast I listened to and the implications are pretty profound. Basically she scanned in thousands of old photographic plates taken by telescopes during the 50's and when she started overlapping them, thousands, if not tens of thousands, of 'stars' were appearing and disappearing. Some were transiting the plates too.

We didn't have anything in space until 1957

Here's results from an X search of her name. This really is remarkable.



https://twitter.com/x/status/1949911536887013563
Click to expand...
Ok, I misunderstood what the plates were, but I know what your talking about now.
 
jeeeep said:
all these "credible" eyewitnesses and not a single photo or security footage? what was his "material proof"?

All this talking bullshit pisses me off, just fucking stop talking and let's see the "material proof"
Click to expand...
Agree with you, I want to see actual proof. I just think that it’s getting more mainstream now so we’ll see some soon I feel. People are more receptive than before… maybe they’re just prepping people for it. Idk
 
Short of them landing on the White House lawn, what would be proof? Hasn't the mountains of sightings and testimonials - very credible ones - from millions of people through the years going back to pre-history not been enough to convince you we're not dealing with human tech? This has been around longer than we have I believe.
 
Ddays said:
Short of them landing on the White House lawn, what would be proof? Hasn't the mountains of sightings and testimonials - very credible ones - from millions of people through the years going back to pre-history not been enough to convince you we're not dealing with human tech? This has been around longer than we have I believe.
Click to expand...
Totally, I do believe there’s been a lot of evidence from ancient civilizations to today. I guess it’s not “proof” I’m looking for but rather the governments to come out with the declaration that, “yes, we have been visited, in fact there are areas on earth where they live, we have been given, and/or, reversed engineered their technology.” Etc… enough with the secrecy already, tell us!
 
Ddays said:
Short of them landing on the White House lawn, what would be proof? Hasn't the mountains of sightings and testimonials - very credible ones - from millions of people through the years going back to pre-history not been enough to convince you we're not dealing with human tech? This has been around longer than we have I believe.
Click to expand...
I get all the ancient drawings but to me, it's some scholar's best guess at trying to interpret what those drawings are.

Sightings and testimonials are just that, never any material proof to validate their claims.

Would be cool if something landed, with all the shit this government has done over time to manipulate people, I'll believe it when I actually see it.

The ancient drawings and all are cool as hell but it's not proof.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom