Lunentucker
Active Member
Not trying to outdo our host here.
I am not an influencer and don't even want to be.
Just a simple condensed 1 minute video on the simple process.
www.youtube.com
NOTES:
If you remove the wrong cable you'll know it pretty quickly, because the Jeep will not have power.
Your subscriptions, display themes, etc. may take a while to come back. Mine were all back the next day.
I would advocate this over full removal at least until your warranty has expired.
I saw another video where the owner removed the fuse first, and then removed the cable. His ESS Off button now shows ESS as being OFF (light on) when the Jeep is started. My light is off, but it will come on if I press the button. Of course, either way, ESS will not implement with the fuse removed. I just found that interesting.
WHY DO THIS?:
Physically separating the two batteries prevents the very common issue that many owners have experienced. That issue is that the AUX battery will begin dying, and it will start cannibalizing the primary battery trying to recharge itself. This often occurs with little to no warning, and it can leave you high and dry, unable to start the vehicle, and in some cases even unable to jump start it, without disconnecting the two batteries.
FAQ:
Does this put my electronics in jeopardy, because the AUX battery is there to keep them stable during ESS cycles?
No. You actually just answered the question for me. Since this process disables ESS, there's no reason to have a second battery in place to keep the electronics at full voltage while the engine is off. In fact, the malfunctioning AUX battery may even have the reverse effect. many owners have seen the "light show" occur when the AUX is failing. Displays and electronics go haywire and you get all kinds of error messages. It can even render the vehicle inoperable until you break the connection and properly recharge the primary battery.
Will this void my warranty?
I don't know. Certainly some dealerships look for a reason to deny a claim, and if they find this has been done, then they'll probably try to use it on any electronics claims. That's why I advocate doing it this way, which is easily reversible when you might need to take the Jeep in for service or claims. At least until the warranty has expired.
But if my warranty is bumper to bumper, including batteries, why would I want to do this?
Well, it's risk management issue for me. I don't want the light show and I don't want to get stranded on top of a mountain somewhere. My dealer isn't sending a rollback up there to save me. You make the choice that you think best suits you.
I am not an influencer and don't even want to be.
Just a simple condensed 1 minute video on the simple process.
Take The Aux Battery Offline - Quick and Easy - Gladiator and Wrangler
The auxiliary battery in the Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator can be problematic. The battery is there to keep electronics stable while the Jeep is in an ESS (Ele...
www.youtube.com
NOTES:
If you remove the wrong cable you'll know it pretty quickly, because the Jeep will not have power.
Your subscriptions, display themes, etc. may take a while to come back. Mine were all back the next day.
I would advocate this over full removal at least until your warranty has expired.
I saw another video where the owner removed the fuse first, and then removed the cable. His ESS Off button now shows ESS as being OFF (light on) when the Jeep is started. My light is off, but it will come on if I press the button. Of course, either way, ESS will not implement with the fuse removed. I just found that interesting.
WHY DO THIS?:
Physically separating the two batteries prevents the very common issue that many owners have experienced. That issue is that the AUX battery will begin dying, and it will start cannibalizing the primary battery trying to recharge itself. This often occurs with little to no warning, and it can leave you high and dry, unable to start the vehicle, and in some cases even unable to jump start it, without disconnecting the two batteries.
FAQ:
Does this put my electronics in jeopardy, because the AUX battery is there to keep them stable during ESS cycles?
No. You actually just answered the question for me. Since this process disables ESS, there's no reason to have a second battery in place to keep the electronics at full voltage while the engine is off. In fact, the malfunctioning AUX battery may even have the reverse effect. many owners have seen the "light show" occur when the AUX is failing. Displays and electronics go haywire and you get all kinds of error messages. It can even render the vehicle inoperable until you break the connection and properly recharge the primary battery.
Will this void my warranty?
I don't know. Certainly some dealerships look for a reason to deny a claim, and if they find this has been done, then they'll probably try to use it on any electronics claims. That's why I advocate doing it this way, which is easily reversible when you might need to take the Jeep in for service or claims. At least until the warranty has expired.
But if my warranty is bumper to bumper, including batteries, why would I want to do this?
Well, it's risk management issue for me. I don't want the light show and I don't want to get stranded on top of a mountain somewhere. My dealer isn't sending a rollback up there to save me. You make the choice that you think best suits you.
