Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

You lost me at "AI was used"
Then don't read it, DGAF. If you read something I would write that long without editing, you would understand.

Also, you do realize that Microsoft word (the entire office suite) as AI to help you refine and edit your work. Something that can take out all the repeating statements and crap, right?
 
As I was typing my reply, I realized that it is long. So if you do not read it all, I understand. I also apologize that it is a longer read than most posts. And yes, AI was used to simplify what I had originally typed and to make it flow better, but the overall message is mine.



You're right, the US pulled out of the JCPOA in 2018. The Trump administration believed the deal had serious flaws: temporary restrictions (sunset clauses), no coverage of Iran’s missile programs or proxy activity, weak inspection access to military sites, and fears that sanctions relief was funding bad actors. The idea behind the withdrawal was to apply pressure and push for a more comprehensive deal—which never came about. And it didn’t help that when Biden came into office, his administration appeared more inclined toward engagement and concessions, which many saw as appeasement rather than accountability. That shift arguably gave Iran more breathing room to accelerate its enrichment and dodge real scrutiny.

As for “what are they distracting us from?” Who really knows. But maybe there is no distractions being made? Could there be political motivations behind timing or media focus? Possibly. But in this case, the crisis is real: Iran’s enrichment levels are way up, IAEA access has been cut off, and sites have been struck. That’s not smoke and mirrors, that’s a genuine escalation.

When it comes to Iran, we've got to remember, they’ve consistently called for the destruction of Israel and labeled the US as “the Great Satan.” Their actions are rooted in ideology as much as strategy. Some in their leadership see global upheaval—especially against the U.S. and Israel—as a path to fulfilling religious prophecy.

So, what’s the endgame? Simple: don’t let Iran get a nuclear weapon.

It’s not about distraction or theater. It’s about preventing a regime that openly calls for the destruction of Israel and the U.S. from gaining the most destructive weapon on earth. And this isn’t just geopolitical maneuvering—it’s tied deeply to their ideology. Some in Iran’s leadership genuinely believe that global chaos and confrontation with “the Great Satan” (America) and the “Zionist regime” (Israel) will set the stage for the return of their messianic figure.

That’s not a theory—it’s what they’ve said, consistently, for years. So the strikes, the pressure, even the withdrawal from the deal—it’s all part of a strategy to delay or deny that nuclear capability. Whether you agree with the tactics or not, the objective is clear: don’t let the most extreme regime in the region cross that line.
You lost me at "AI was used"
^^ This!
 
Then don't read it, DGAF. If you read something I would write that long without editing, you would understand.

Also, you do realize that Microsoft word (the entire office suite) as AI to help you refine and edit your work. Something that can take out all the repeating statements and crap, right?
Just drop the nuke on us… we’re toast anyway. (Typed in Analog)
 
Iran does allow the IAEA to be around. However, the IAEA only detects enriched uranium through environmental sampling during physical inspections. not remotely. Inspectors use surface swipes inside facilities and analyze them in ultra-sensitive labs that can pick up even microscopic traces. They found enriched uranium to 83.7% during a scheduled, albeit very limited, inspection.

Iran claimed it was an “accidental fluctuation,” but inspectors noted that centrifuges had been reconfigured without notice, which raised suspicions. So, while it may not have been sustained enrichment to weapons-grade levels, it definitely caught international attention.

As for bomb development, you’re spot on. Building a first-gen nuclear weapon usually requires live testing, and that kind of test would almost certainly be picked up by global monitoring systems. HOWEVER, with enough highly enriched uranium and access to modern simulations or outside designs, a country could theoretically assemble a CRUDE device without ever testing it.
Russia and China could easily educate them in this endeavor and probably are knee deep in effort, thank God Trump had the balls to say No, not on my watch.
 
Top Bottom