Recent content by JimLee

No, not really, but hey just make some shit up. It's really simple, no amount of caster is going to correct high control arm angles that affect front impact feel, and anti dive. This is suspension 101 shit. Hey don't do it if you don't want, my jeep drives great and that's what matters to me...

"It is not stupid to run adjustable control arms and suspension geometry correction brackets on a Jeep Wrangler. In fact, these brackets can improve front impact ride quality (expansion joints, ledges), increase anti-dive for improved braking performance, decrease the operating angle range of...

I had the Synergy stuff on my factory axle and was told by Dynatrac that it wouldn't work because of the taper being different, so I just used the stuff they included with the steering kit. I think the drag link is probably the same taper because there was no change or drilling required at the...

Those lower brackets are for a ram. You can run a stabilizer piggyback to the track bar bolt with an extended bolt like the synergy one and you won't have clearance issues besides rotating it back a bit to clear the drag link. I'm sure you can mount a stabilizer on the ram mounts but why, it's a...

i think it's the ARB's that don't like synthetic.

Whatever dude, you make statements as absolutes and then retreat to context, not sure why I'm surprised.

I don't really think you need to start correcting the geometry of arms until you start going pretty high with a lift and being that the bread and butter of most lift manufacturers is in the 2.5-3.5 inch range that's why they don't include geometry correction brackets. If you are going higher why...

I never said you need geometry correction brackets for a 2.5-3" lift. What I said is the idea that brackets and adjustable arms is an either or thing is not a true statement. Long arms and geometry brackets accomplish the exact same thing through different methods, they are both ways of reducing...

Simply not true. While some people use geometry brackets to help correct caster that is not their true purpose. They are designed to keep the control arms as parallel with the ground as possible, which makes for a better ride. Suspensions with high control arm angles have to overcome the axles...

No he's right, it should be called "Overloading", I'm at the enthusiast level myself.

I've got a Sport swaybar laying around if anyone needs one, I can't use the Apex, too much travel for their 10.5" stroke ones. But, as previous posted, unless you have a broken Rubicon sway bar disconnect there's really no reason to switch, and even then the manual Rubicon disconnect made by Evo...

Well, red spray it is then.